One of the big ideas of this course is that literacy is now a plural concept--there are multiple literacies active in any learning environment, even within what may seem like traditional content classrooms. Students and teachers are not just writing and reading, but communicating in many symbolic, meaningful ways, using both print, visual, digital, performative and other sign systems. Although content reading theorists continue to debate whether to embrace, or ignore the New Literacies of pop culture and younger generations, their tools and modes are relevant to aspects of contemporary meaning-making. In order to help youth develop multiple literacies for communicating in the 21st Century, and extend our own instructional approaches to content literacy, we need to recognize how they operate and are valued in different contexts, learning events, and disciplinary discourses.
To prepare for our first class, you will be undertaking your own literacy dig (go to our Blackboard Discussion Tool, Jan 9 LITERACY DIG forum for instructions), and then sharing some of your findings in class. Coleen and I have provided our own models below, and the following glossary of terms will help you make sense of the reading.
Glossary of Terms for Jan 9: (Alvermann et al, pp 1-15)
NOTE: It is posted in a double-entry, two-column format. Relevant terms from textbook and article readings will be starred*. Additional terms used by instructors that will support our vocabulary for this course may also appear without a star*. You are responsible for learning these terms and using them in journals, class discussions.
Intro VOCABULARY
|
Questions, Implications:
|
*Content-Area Literacy is the ability
to use reading, writing, speaking, listening, representing, viewing and other
sign systems to construct meaning with print and non-print texts (p 4)
|
How does
this definition influence our notion of what a text is? Who defines texts in each content area?
|
*Content Inquiry-integrated processes
of reading, writing and representing to develop independent learners and
learning (p 6)
|
Can we use
similar inquiry processes in different disciplines? This is where the idea of
content reading methods developed.
|
*Four Processes (Freebody, 1999):
Code
breaker, meaning-maker, text user, text critic
|
These
processes support the theory that reading is an active transaction between
reader and text, and that readers have shared authority in the reading
experience.
|
*Disciplinary Languages/ Discourses:
language is situated in context and purpose (hard sciences vs social studies),
including the beliefs, values and practices of that discipline.
|
What do
these discourses share, or in what ways are they distinguished? How do they
use different print genres or modes of communication?
|
New Literacy and Transactional
Reading Theories confirm that literacy is *multimodal: that we
learn through various modes of
communication, using a variety of tools and media for different purposes
and audiences.
|
Modes are the paths of
communication-how many modes did you find in your literacy dig?
|
*Motivation in Content reading, 6 C’s
(14) Intrinsic motivation plays a large factor in the life of an active
reader, that wanting to know” and connect with the world
|
We will
discuss the 6 C’s in class.
|
Both or
informal and formal learning processes at home, in school, and contexts in
between support our
*schema (webs of info and understanding) and *prior knowledge of any content
subject.
|
Prior knowledge is a key component to
developing comprehension and a major factor in assessing student readiness
for new knowledge.
|
Strategy vs Skill-Based Learning:
Strategies
are flexible methods readers and writers use to become more aware of how, not
just what, they learn. Both strategies and skills are relevant to content
learning.
|
A focus of
this class is guiding students to take on their own toolkit of content strategies that allow them to use
skills and practices more fluidly between subject areas.
|
*Social Constructionism (Vygotsky,
1978; Bruner, 1986) p 7-9: the idea that language-based learning is socially
constructed and influenced by many contexts in which children are
exposed.
|
The
implications are immense—independent growth becomes tied to classroom culture
and group progress.
|
Stephanie's Dig:
The following dig is one I pursued last Winter in my daughter's room--I chose this context because my 8 year-old 3rd grader was beginning to immerse herself both in her personal / home environment, as well as new print and visual literacy interests that seemed relevant to Alvermann et al's introductory discussion of the intersection between home and school literacies.
We learn from Alvermann and her co-authors that language is situated; here Claire invites with a written welcome into her room and book corner, fit with beanbag and curtains.
Coleen's Dig:
The kitchen is the heart of our tiny home. As my family prepares for a move in just a few weeks (and Christmas items have yet to be packed away), I was surprised to see so many examples of the "home" literacies that I could apply in a school setting around the room.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.